Many times families that use medical advances to conceive a child find the idea of adopting their intended child repugnant. They desire, instead, to have the state legally recognize them as parents without undergoing an adoption.
In 1983, the State of New Jersey enacted a statute that created a process to allow a non-biological father to become a legal/natural father without adoption when his wife conceived a child through donor sperm and artificial insemination. If structured correctly, the non-biological father could be considered the legal/natural father of his wife's child without having to adopt his wife's biological child. Since this statute's creation, medical advances and case law have permitted parties to create families and receive legal recognition without adoption in three distinct ways:
1. A husband whose wife is artificially inseminated with donor sperm can be recognized as a legal father without an adoption (see NJS 9:17-44);
2. A married couple who provide their own egg and sperm to create an embryo transferred to a gestational carrier may be recognized as the legal mother and legal father without an adoption [see A.H.W. v. G.H.B, 339 N.J. Super. 496 (Ch. Div. 2000)]; and
3. A lesbian couple who use donor sperm to artificially inseminate one of the partners may have the non-biological parent equally recognized as the legal parent of the child without an adoption [see In re Robinson, 383 N.J. Super. 165 (Ch. Div. 2005)].
Yesterday's appellate court decision rejected a fourth way to create a legal parent without an adoption. In In The Matter of the Parentage of a Child by T.J.S. and A.L.S., Docket No. A-4784-09T4, decided on February 23, 2011, an embryo created with a husband's sperm and a donor egg was implanted into a gestational carrier. The intended parents (husband and wife) then tried to obtain legal recognition of the husband's wife as the legal mother without having the husband's wife legally adopt her husband's biological child. The appellate division recognized the three examples provided above (husband, married couple, and lesbian couple), but rejected its application in this case. The distinguished characteristic was that the husband's wife was not a biological parent - it was not her egg.
There are other states that treat intended mothers as legal mothers without adoption. However, the Court refused to overreach into the legislative field to expand existing law.
http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a4784-09.pdf
UPDATE: Reaction Story on TV News